<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<org.eclipse.epf.uma:ContentDescription xmi:version="2.0" xmlns:xmi="http://www.omg.org/XMI" xmlns:org.eclipse.epf.uma="http://www.eclipse.org/epf/uma/1.0.6/uma.ecore" xmlns:epf="http://www.eclipse.org/epf" epf:version="1.5.1" xmi:id="-gqNN4DnROmJpgKtrdguhpg" name="new_checklist,_7BZa0DIdEduDTv4Y1akVTA" guid="-gqNN4DnROmJpgKtrdguhpg" changeDate="2006-08-23T00:08:14.915+0330">
  <sections xmi:id="_qO41ADIfEduDTv4Y1akVTA" name="Have all potential risks to the project been identified?" guid="_qO41ADIfEduDTv4Y1akVTA">
    <sectionDescription>&lt;ul>&#xD;
    &#xD;
  &lt;li> Have you identified anything that could deter you on the path to the project &#xD;
    success?&amp;nbsp; &lt;/li>&#xD;
    &lt;li>&#xD;
        Have you involved the team and stakeholders in risk identification?&#xD;
    &lt;/li>&#xD;
    &#xD;
  &lt;li> Have you made sure that several categories were considered (technical, &#xD;
    project management, organizational, and external)? &lt;/li>&#xD;
&lt;/ul>&#xD;
&lt;p>&#xD;
    List all potential risks, giving a description and type (direct or indirect). See &lt;a class=&quot;elementLinkWithType&quot; href=&quot;./../../../openup/guidances/concepts/risk_AF5840DA.html&quot; guid=&quot;_0bsLgMlgEdmt3adZL5Dmdw&quot;>Concept: Risk&lt;/a>&amp;nbsp;for&#xD;
    more information.&#xD;
&lt;/p></sectionDescription>
  </sections>
  <sections xmi:id="_5RiSkDe2EduD7J48kKN20g" name="Have all risks been described without ambiguity?" guid="_5RiSkDe2EduD7J48kKN20g">
    <sectionDescription>Are risks captured and described in a clear, concise, and unambiguous way? Also &#xD;
follow these rules when describing response strategies for risks. This will help &#xD;
you avoid unnecessary work and -- more importantly -- increase the probability &#xD;
that risks are effectively identified and managed.</sectionDescription>
  </sections>
  <sections xmi:id="_2rpQoDIfEduDTv4Y1akVTA" name="Have all major risks been evaluated?" guid="_2rpQoDIfEduDTv4Y1akVTA">
    <sectionDescription>&lt;ul>&#xD;
&#xD;
    &lt;li>&#xD;
&#xD;
        Has the team assessed the order of magnitude of&amp;nbsp; each risk (probability x impact)?&#xD;
&#xD;
    &lt;/li>&#xD;
&#xD;
    &#xD;
  &lt;li> Have the risks been sorted according to their magnitude? This&amp;nbsp;allows &#xD;
    you to address the higher-magnitude risks early in the project. &lt;/li>&#xD;
&#xD;
    &#xD;
  &lt;li> Has a response strategy been chosen for higher-magnitude risks? &lt;/li>&#xD;
&#xD;
&lt;/ul>&#xD;
&#xD;
&lt;p>&#xD;
&#xD;
    See &lt;a class=&quot;elementLinkWithType&quot; href=&quot;./../../../openup/guidances/concepts/risk_AF5840DA.html&quot; guid=&quot;_0bsLgMlgEdmt3adZL5Dmdw&quot;>Concept: Risk&lt;/a>&amp;nbsp;and&amp;nbsp;&lt;a class=&quot;elementLinkWithType&quot; href=&quot;./../../../openup/guidances/guidelines/risk_management_B1256EB4.html&quot; guid=&quot;_VNxL4ACsEdu8m4dIntu6jA&quot;>Guideline: Managing Risks&lt;/a> for more information.&#xD;
&#xD;
&lt;/p></sectionDescription>
  </sections>
  <sections xmi:id="_hSFaYDe3EduD7J48kKN20g" name="Are there interdependencies between risks?" guid="_hSFaYDe3EduD7J48kKN20g">
    <sectionDescription>&lt;span style=&quot;FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: Arial&quot;>Make sure that you establish &#xD;
interdependencies between risks as appropriate. For example, the consequence of &#xD;
a risk happening may raise the probability of another risk happening or raise &#xD;
the impact that another risk could have on the project. If risks depend on each &#xD;
other, you may need a response strategy to mitigate&amp;nbsp;all interdependent risks&amp;nbsp;at &#xD;
the same time, or you may need revisit the risk list to update the magnitude of &#xD;
dependent risks.&lt;/span></sectionDescription>
  </sections>
</org.eclipse.epf.uma:ContentDescription>
